Saturday 4 July 2009

Gemmell award - the top 20 books

Thanks to Hobbit for the heads-up here. As we all know, dozens of books were nominated for the first Gemmell award - but here's the top 20, in order of how many votes they received...

BLOOD OF ELVES - Andrzej Sapkowski (winner)
THE HERO OF AGES – Brandon Sanderson
THE WAY OF SHADOWS - Brent Weeks
THE LAST ARGUMENT OF KINGS - Joe Abercrombie
HEIR TO SEVENWATERS - Juliet Marillier

THE TWO PEARLS OF WISDOM - Alison Goodman
THE KINGDOM BEYOND THE WAVES - Stephen Hunt
HAVEMERCY - Jaida Jones and Danielle Bennett
THE PAINTED MAN - Peter V. Brett
TOLL THE HOUNDS - Steven Erikson

GLADIATRIX - Russell Whitfield
EMPIRE IN BLACK AND GOLD - Adrian Tchaikovsky
GRACELING - Kristin Cashore
KING'S SHIELD - Sherwood Smith
HELDENHAMMER -Graham McNeill

THE STEEL REMAINS - Richard Morgan
WRATH OF A MAD GOD - Raymond E. Feist
WOLFBLADE - Jennifer Fallon
THE SOLDIER KING - Violette Malan
MAGIC BURNS - Ilona Andrews

There are a few surprises there. I thought The Painted Man would have finished slightly higher (in fact, I'm still surprised that it didn't made the final shortlist). It's good to see Adrian Tchaikovsky's Empire in Black and Gold putting in a strong showing (that finished higher than I expected). Graceling by Kristin Cashore did really well for a debut novel that didn't seem to generate that much online buzz. The main absentee is Paul Kearney's The Ten Thousand - I wasn't the only blogger to think that this would have been a very suitable winner, and its absence from the above list is a little disappointing, not to mention surprising as it sold pretty well on both sides of the Atlantic. Then again, since most of the votes came from outside the UK and the US, maybe it's not that much of a surprise after all. 

4 comments:

Adam Whitehead said...

GRACELING didn't generate a lot of online discussion, but that may be because a lot of the 'usual suspects' online are a bit disdainful of YA novels. I remember Pat read it 'by accident' and seemed to think it was an infectious disease when he found out he'd been reading a YA book ;-)

I suspect the book did very well in other areas, and I know it sold very impressively in the UK by itself on release.

The absence of the Kearney is regretabble, but he can aim for it again next time :-)

Memory said...

GRACELING didn't generate much online buzz? Really? I've come across scads of GRACELING-centric discussion. Most of that was on non-genre blogs, though; I don't think I've seen much about it on any of the sffh blogs I read.

James said...

@ Adam - unless there's a change in the voting format I can't see someone like Kearney ever winning the award, as he just doesn't have the sales figures of some of the other contenders. He's a far better writer than, say, Brent Weeks, but Weeks has better sales figures and ultimately with the current set-up this will make a difference. A shame, but there we go.

@ Memory - I didn't see much discussion, but then again I only visit two different forums. It may well have been discussed plenty elsewhere. I might check the book out, actually.

Anonymous said...

so far Graceling has not been that interesting and I have been thinking of abandoning it because but before I did I just wanted to know if it gets better later on and if it is worth reading the whole book.